<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby vs Python vs Windows vs Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mastrodonato.info/index.php/2010/03/ruby-vs-python-vs-windows-vs-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mastrodonato.info/index.php/2010/03/ruby-vs-python-vs-windows-vs-linux/</link>
	<description>Non c&#039;e&#039; prezzo per la miticita&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Mastrodonato</title>
		<link>http://mastrodonato.info/index.php/2010/03/ruby-vs-python-vs-windows-vs-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-7553</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Mastrodonato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mastrodonato.info/?p=432#comment-7553</guid>
		<description>Depends on the virtual machine: JVM is faster than others version. Why are you so surprised?
Please, let us continue in english section. This is in italian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on the virtual machine: JVM is faster than others version. Why are you so surprised?<br />
Please, let us continue in english section. This is in italian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maurizio</title>
		<link>http://mastrodonato.info/index.php/2010/03/ruby-vs-python-vs-windows-vs-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-7551</link>
		<dc:creator>maurizio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mastrodonato.info/?p=432#comment-7551</guid>
		<description>???

how can jruby have a better performance than ruby???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>???</p>
<p>how can jruby have a better performance than ruby???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://mastrodonato.info/index.php/2010/03/ruby-vs-python-vs-windows-vs-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-7544</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 17:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mastrodonato.info/?p=432#comment-7544</guid>
		<description>Also note that jruby has a new version released now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also note that jruby has a new version released now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://mastrodonato.info/index.php/2010/03/ruby-vs-python-vs-windows-vs-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-7543</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 17:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mastrodonato.info/?p=432#comment-7543</guid>
		<description>Surprising to see Ruby 1.9.1 p129	i386-mingw32 ahead of its linux counterpart (?)

Also note that rubinius is fast (maybe pypy is fast, too, or unladden swallow?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprising to see Ruby 1.9.1 p129	i386-mingw32 ahead of its linux counterpart (?)</p>
<p>Also note that rubinius is fast (maybe pypy is fast, too, or unladden swallow?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
